The resolution (meaning here the MTF50 function) test of the Tamron 17-35 mm f/2.8-4.0 Di OSD was based on RAW files from the Canon EOS 5D Mark III.In the case of that reflex camera the decency level is situated near 30-32 lpmm and high quality, top-of-the-range fixed focal length lenses can reach a maximum level of 45 . I would be happy to save 100 grams. Sony FE PZ 16-35 mm f/4 G - first impressions . Both are available for multiple camera mounts (including Canon, Nikon and . What is the difference between Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G and Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD? The Tamron 17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD (1000 euros) is an excellent complement to the Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III RXD, it offers very good/excellent performances at 2,5 times less the price of the Sony FE 16-35 mm F2.8 GM (2700 euros) Obviously the focal range is smaller , but if you have the Tamron 28-75 it complements it without any overlap (like . This Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 is as good optically as Nikon's world-changing 14-24mm f/2.8 of 2007, and this Tokina lens costs less than half as much. This was great information for me since I was tossing around the idea of upgrading to the new Canon 85mm f1.4 from my current Tamron 85mm f1.8. Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG HSM Art vs Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 Di ... - VERSUS I especially like the 67 mm filters because I could ditch the 72 mm filter wallet and use 67 mm filters from another lens (Batis 85). . Anyone has experience with these lens? Sigma "HSM" lenses actually may or may not use micromotors as well, such as in the 17-50 F2.8. ab 3, 73 € pro Woche. It's the first to feature a f/2.8 maximum aperture, following the more . If you want tough, Nikon still delivers in its pro gear. These were RAW files I compared. Which would you prefer: Sony 16-35 f4 or Tamron 17-28 f2.8? Print Share. I could live with the 17 vs 16 mm. Sony FE 16-35mm F/4 ZA OSS Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* vs Tamron 17-28mm ...